I was at a conference a few weeks ago.
Because of my interest in eschatology, that is, the doctrine of the end times, I
went to one seminar about hell. The young man was presenting a summary of his dissertation
which happened to deal with eternal punishment.
His thesis was interesting. He was looking at various
interpretations of biblical texts dealing with judgment and eternal punishment
and how we can understand the eternal condition of the unsaved given the
variety of pictures given to us in Scripture. I thought he presented an
interesting hypothesis and defended it quite well.
When he opened a time for questions, several good ideas
and challenges were raised and he answered each inquiry very well. But then
came the zinger.
This person asked why the presenter was talking about the
various biblical portrayals of eternal punishment as metaphors. The question
caught me completely off-guard. What else would those pictures be? After all, a
metaphor paints a picture of reality but does not necessarily deny the reality.
In other words, if I say that God is a rock, I am not denying that God is God.
I am simply saying that some of the characteristics of a rock remind me of the
way God is.
The presenter answered the question well. But the
questioner persisted. “Are you saying that there is not literal fire and
screaming, and torture, and darkness?”
Once again, the young presenter replied
well, explaining that these are depictions of the horrors of being separated
from God but not necessarily hard and fast literal representations of a
particular place. After all, he explained, how can a place be both utterly dark and have fire? Good
response.
Undaunted, the questioner replied that in the Bible, God
tells us what he wants us to know and that God obviously wanted us to know that
this (fire, screaming, etc.) was what hell really was.
I confess that I didn’t hear many “hell” sermons growing
up. But I also know that Reformed theology in general is quite reticent to say
much about hell and eternal punishment, leaving it to God’s eternal wisdom. One
Reformed theologian even says we should all hope hell is empty. This is what I
grew up with.
But it occurred to me that perhaps Rob Bell had a very
different background; one with a pastor like the questioner. The questioner
seemed not only to want to insist on eternal, active, tortuous suffering of the
reprobate, but also seemed to delight in this knowledge. Yikes! Perhaps Rob's reading of Scripture is a bit more understandable.
I think you nailed it. I grew up going to Calvary, where Rob Bell grew up (I believe) and interned (I remember). While I do not remember much fire and brimstone from the pulpit, overly literal readings---in the sense of missing what precisely a metaphor is---would not have been out of place in the general evangelical culture it inhabited.
ReplyDelete-Dylan