Recently,
in my little town, we were asked to vote about an additional tax that would
bring public transportation to our town, connecting us with the nearby city
where many people work. The tax would have amounted $120 per year for a
$200,000 house.
Now
of course, if you have read my blog in the past, you realize that I am not
particularly unbiased where public transportation is concerned. For a
substantial part of the year, I take the bus to work, although I drive to get
to the nearest stop. So I am a believer in the importance of the city bus.
What
is impossible not to notice when I do ride the bus, is the number of people
who, unlike me, have no choice. This is, in fact, their only means of
transportation. Many of them have to transfer routes, wait in the rain, and
spend more than an hour getting to a place that would probably take only 15
minutes if they could drive a car.
Some
of the people on the bus have lost their driver’s license for one reason or
another. Some are simply unable to drive because of physical or mental disabilities.
Some are too young to drive. But what is characteristic of nearly all of the
riders, is that if they want to get to work, school, a doctor’s appointment, or
even the welfare office, the only way to do it is via public transportation.
Enter
the Tea Party. Worse yet, enter the local Tea Party pastor. Yes, I did say
pastor.
Just
days before the election, one of our local pastors who identified himself as a
co-organizer of the local Tea Party, wrote a letter to the editor of our paper.
In it, he urges voters to “vote no on this request.” The reason? Affirming the
proposal for public transportation would “increase the size of government and
taxes.” He asks, “If we are fed up with
the size, growth, and cost of government elsewhere, why would we vote for a
government-run, tax-funded public transportation system?”
Well
Pastor Tyler, perhaps because we care about those around us who do not have
access to transportation without such a system. Unless of course, you are
proposing to organize your parishioners to provide such a system to those who
cannot get their children to the doctor, are unable to find reliable
transportation to work, or even are unable to find a way to get to church on
Sunday. And maybe you would be on the
top of the list of those willing to spend several hours a week driving the elderly,
disabled, and others who cannot drive to their destinations.
Not
that I’m cynical, but I doubt that our good pastor thought that far. After all,
doesn’t everybody have a car or relatives to take them where they need to go?
And if they don’t, isn’t that their fault? And why should I pay for them to get
to work? Wouldn’t I rather complain about all those people on public assistance
who are “too lazy” to get jobs and just ignore the reality that without
transportation, they can’t work?
I
wonder whether the pastor thought about how the non-Christian community would
view a church that is so myopic that they cannot see the most basic needs
around them. I wonder how the church's message of “love your neighbor” sounds to those people. I have a pretty good guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment